Cross-cutting methods

Scientific AI

I build fast, physically informed models that make expensive simulations usable for inference—and apply modern machine learning where it can preserve uncertainty, improve scale, or reveal structure that conventional methods cannot.

Neural emulatorsNormalizing flowsDifferentiable modellingProbabilistic MLSimulation-to-observation transfer

My approach treats machine learning as part of the scientific model, not as a black-box prediction layer. Physical parameterizations, simulation validation, uncertainty quantification, and out-of-distribution tests are central to deciding whether a model is useful for cosmology.

These methods span intergalactic-medium emulation, differentiable galaxy and halo histories, spectral modelling, photometric-redshift inference, and robust source classification. The complete publication record is grouped by methodological strand below.

01

Simulation emulators & cosmological inference

Learning costly hydrodynamical predictions while retaining explicit cosmological and astrophysical parameters.

02

Differentiable & surrogate physical models

Compact, interpretable descriptions of halo growth, star formation, spectra, and galaxy colours.

03

Machine learning for survey data

Probabilistic inference and domain adaptation for photometric surveys.

2021

Scalable statistical inference of photometric redshift via data subsampling

Graph-guided subsampling and Gaussian-process ensembles with predictive uncertainty.

04

Perspectives on Scientific AI

Reviews and roadmaps connecting machine-learning methodology to trustworthy computational cosmology.

2020

Scientific AI Approaches in Computational Cosmology

A roadmap for emulation, uncertainty quantification, physical symmetries, and validation.